
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 西安理工大学水利水电学院
2. 西安理工大学 水利水电学院陕西,西安,710048
纸质出版日期:2009,
网络出版日期:2009-5-24,
扫 描 看 全 文
孙建,张春财,丰小玲.溪洛渡高拱坝反拱水垫塘与平底水垫塘流场的三维数值模拟比较[J].工程科学与技术,2009,41(5):8-16.
sunjian, 张春财, 丰小玲. Comparison fields of the flow and the pressure produced in the arch inverted plunge cushion pool of Xiluodo arch dam with those in the flat-bottomed by using 3-d numerical simulation[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2009,41(5):8-16.
孙建,张春财,丰小玲.溪洛渡高拱坝反拱水垫塘与平底水垫塘流场的三维数值模拟比较[J].工程科学与技术,2009,41(5):8-16. DOI:
sunjian, 张春财, 丰小玲. Comparison fields of the flow and the pressure produced in the arch inverted plunge cushion pool of Xiluodo arch dam with those in the flat-bottomed by using 3-d numerical simulation[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2009,41(5):8-16. DOI:
中文摘要: 采用RNG型k-ε三维紊流数学模型和自由水面“刚盖”的假定,对溪洛渡高拱坝七表孔泄洪工况下,反拱水垫塘与平底水垫塘的流场进行了数值模拟。首先把反拱水垫塘溢流中心线、两岸边附近的流速以及拱底板压强的计算值与相应的模型实测值进行了验证。在此基础上,对两种水垫塘的流态特征、近壁流速沿程扩散特征、底板压强特征等进行了详细比较。研究表明,两种水垫塘体型各有利弊。在水舌入水区,反拱水垫塘的流态和底板压强分布更趋合理,而平底水垫塘隅角有高压区,易产生破坏。在冲击区上下游,反拱水垫塘的流态、消能效果和底板压强分布的合理性逊于平底水垫塘。研究成果可为水垫塘型式的选择和设计提供参考。
Abstract:The flowing fields of the arch-inverted form of plunge cushion pool and the flat-bottomed one
by the action of flood discharging of seven surface outlets
Xi Luodu high arch dam
were numerically simulated by using 3-d RNG k-ε turbulence model and rapid lid hypothesis applied in water surface. Firstly
the simulation results like the velocity at center and on both sides as well as the wall pressure were detailedly compared with those from the hydraulic experiment on the inverted-arch pool of Xiluodu
and It was proved that they were well accordant. On a basis of this
characteristics of the flowing condition
diffusion of the velocity near the wall and the wall pressure produced by both forms of the plunge cushion pool were detailly compared. The investigation showed that both had a good side and a bad one. On the impacting zone of jets
the flowing condition and the wall pressure distribution produced in the arch inverted pool were more reasonable
while there were zones of high pressure near corners to be easily damaged for the flat-bottomed. On its downstream and upstream reaches
those in the inverted were worse. The research provided a reference for the design
and had a very important signification.
反拱水垫塘平底水垫塘三维RNG型k-ε紊流数学模型流场与压强场
inverted-arch plunge cushion poolflat bottom pool3D RNG turbulent modelflow and pressure field
陈长植;茅泽育;李春华,溪洛渡水电站高拱坝大流量泄洪消能关键技术研究,北京:清华大学,1999.
丰小玲,高拱坝下游水垫塘流场的数值模拟,西安:西安理工大学,2006.
焦爱萍,刘沛清,刘宪亮.基于计算流体动力学的不同流量比两股射流水垫塘的消能特性研究[J].水科学进展,2008(2)
焦爱萍,张春满,刘沛清.多层水股射流在水垫塘内流场特性的数值模拟[J].灌溉排水学报,2007(3)
沙海飞;周辉;吴时强.坝身泄洪水气两相流二维数值模拟[J].水动力学研究与进展A辑,2007(3)
彭新民,王继敏,崔广涛.拱坝水垫塘拱形底板受力与稳定性实验研究[J].水力发电学报,1999(2)
Xu Weilin,Numerical simulation of 3-d flow field in arciform plunge pool,Journal of Hydrodynamics Series B,2002.
许唯临,王韦,谭立新.水工水气两相流的数值模拟[J].水动力学研究与进展A辑,2001(2)
谭立新,许唯临,杨永全.泄水水垫塘内单位水体消能率的研究[J].水动力学研究与进展A辑,2000(3)
孙建,杨丽萍,赵燕华.高水头、大流量下反拱水垫塘底板块随机振动特性的研究[J].水力发电学报,2008(2)
杨敏;刘鹏.反拱水垫塘衬砌结构整体稳定性研究[J].水利学报,2005(10)
孙建;陈长值.反拱水垫塘拱端力变化规律的试验研究[J].水力发电学报,2002(4)
孙建;陈长植.反拱水垫塘与平底水垫塘稳定性诸方面之比较[J].长江科学院院报,2003(4)
崔广涛,彭新民,杨敏.反拱型水垫塘-窄河谷大流量高坝泄洪消能工的合理选择[J].水利水电技术,2001(12)
0
浏览量
162
下载量
18
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621